Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation Research Paper

Intrinsic vs. adventitious Motivation - Research Paper Exampleperform at the best possible level. This pauperism could be innate or derived from external forces/functions, referred to as intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation, rateively. Level and/or fervency of these two types of motivation have an impact on individuals commitment, interest, and ability to perform, learn and gain ground in all aspects of life, be it knowledge, working, or performing any other activity. Moreover, individuals are variably attached towards extrinsic and intrinsic rewards. Extensive theorizing and research have pointed out that both these motivations are impacted by each other and that they either enhance or undermine impact of the other. This study explores this aspect of motivation while comparing and contrasting both types, with support derived from theories, researches and practical applications.Getting inspired by lovable in activities that produce excitement and challenge is a basi c human nature and is one of the centre routes towards human development (Sansone & Harackiewicz, 2000). The Cognitive Evaluation Theory explains intrinsic motivation as individuals opinion or feeling and competence rather than an inner urge itself. Here the control and learning aspects emerge when rewards are attached to task accomplishment. The CET proposes that an individuals intrinsic motivation is based on control and information. It proposes that if the individuals locus of control lies outside, so intrinsic motivation is low and if it lies inside, then intrinsic motivation is high secondly, if the individual has positive information of competence, knowledge, and/or stimulation, then intrinsic motivation is higher and vice versa (Weinberg, 2009). Traditionally, extrinsic rewards were considered as harmful because extrinsic motivation was compared with extrinsic punishment (Cameron & Pierce, 4). The CET possibility forms the base for understanding intrinsic and extrinsic moti vation as well as many arguments with respect to